Book 2’s make me
nervous. The more I like book 1, the more nervous book 2 makes me. What if I
don’t like it and lose pleasure in book 1 and lose book 3 entirely? It’s rough
to want to like a book or author and find you just can’t.
There's been more
than one series where I’ve loved book 1, but book 2 stopped me from completing
the series, and even from reading anything else by that author. I experienced this
unfortunate trauma a little while back, and it got me thinking about what I, as
a reader, want and don’t want in a second novel and how that should affect me
as a writer.
First, it forced to think about what I loved about the first story. Was it the
characters? The developing relationships? The overall plot? The action and
adventure? The milieu? The writer’s voice and story genre? The combination of all of those?
For me, it’s usually
the characters and their relationships that is the strongest drive to book 2. I
like the action, adventure, and mystery, and I trust the author to deliver that
same kind of thing in book 2, with similar style, tone, and humor. But the
characters are the strongest draw. And not just the main characters. Secondary
characters are magnetic as well. Basically, I want to see all my
favorite characters interacting in book 2. I want to know the fate of some
character left in danger. I want to understand some mystery regarding this or that character. I want the hero and heroine to end up together, and those lovable
secondary characters to have their relationships resolved happily. I want the
redeemable character redeemed.
In short, the draw to a
second and third book, for me, is usually not the ultimate destruction of the
villain or the fulfillment of a quest, it’s the characters. So you might say
what drives the reader is not the same as what drives the main characters. The
reader and MC may have different goals, and the author must satisfy both.
Taking those things
into consideration, I came up with seven things that readers don’t want in a
second novel.
What readers don’t want is for a second novel to
1) Lose sight of the character interactions
Too often the rich
characters we came to love in book 1 are scattered in book two. Or the
relationships are tainted by drama that often seems forced. In epic fantasies,
like LOTR and Patrick Carr’s novels, and movies like The Avengers, the separation of characters is often necessary, but
even then, some of the characters are kept together to give us those beloved
interactions.
I’ve been reading W.R.
Gingell’s A City Between books lately (and loving them). One of the things I
love about the story series is the characters: the MC Pet, her three
“owners,” and the two secondary characters Detective Tuatu and Daniel. Granted,
Gingell has small character list in this series, but she consistently develops
the relationships between the main four characters over the series, and keeps
us connected to the two secondary characters even if they have little page
time. For instance, we don’t see Detective Tuatu very much after the first chapter of the third book, but there are mentions of him and humorous text
message exchanges that keep him “alive” to me as a reader and keep me happy.
There are valid reasons for him not being “on page” a lot too, which is important. Also, the interactions between the books' characters also change over time as relationships deepen. Like this series, the Harry Potter
series, The Avengers, and many other
successful series actively keep their characters interacting and relationships
developing. Even James Bond has a few consistent secondary characters to
interact with at headquarters over the course of his many adventures.
On the other hand, in that
recent read that traumatized me, the main character rescues her mother (who she
had thought dead) in book 1. You’d think the mom would be a big part of book 2.
No. She’s mentioned every now and then, but there’s little effort at connection
between her and the MC and only a shallow excuse for this. Hardly any of the
characters from book 1 get more than slight mentions, and they were a big part
of what made me want to read book 2. Because of the virtual loss of the first book's relationships and development of a second set of secondary characters, the second book felt like it should have
been different character’s story altogether. Another character-interaction fail for me was
Star Wars: The Last Jedi (reviewed here).
I assumed the characters from the previous movie would form a team and go on
fun adventures together. I was looking forward to that. No. They hardly
interacted at all.
2) Add in soap opera drama and character immaturity
Can’t have the main couple
getting together too early in the series, now can we? So let’s manufacture some
drama—based on a silly misunderstanding—to keep them apart. Actually, please
don’t. Don’t have your characters acting in immature, unhealthy ways just to
create drama and push the HEA off to book 3. If these behaviors are part of their
character arc and they are going to grow out of them, sure, but if not, please
spare us. You can find a better way to add tension to the relationship or to the
story overall. And consider a more original drama that family secrets involving
affairs and unknown siblings. I stopped reading one teen series mostly because,
well, it became a very teen series. Cliché romance scenes. Unexpected parental
indiscretions. Immature, what-were-you-thinking decisions by a character
previously pretty sensible. Haven’t read a book by that author since.
3) Change tone, especially from semi-light to very dark
The story arc of an
epic fantasy probably requires going a bit darker in the second book, but readers
don’t like it overdone. Give the readers some hope and humor, especially if
that is part of your first story and brand. You want your readers to trust you
so they’ll stick around for other books. Go too dark, or throw in sensitive
scenes they weren’t expecting (like rape or the death of a beloved character or
a whole bunch of characters when the first story is pretty light in tone) may
be a turn off.
4) Have a lot of traveling to boring places
Questing or running for
your life or moving an entire populace is fairly common in second books (and
third books), at least judging by my experience. This is more of an observation
than a critique. If the readers love the milieu, if it’s a quest type of novel,
this is probably a great choice. New places can be fascinating, especially if
there is a mystery attached to them. Patrick Carr’s The Hero’s Lot (The Sword and the Staff) is a great example of well-done traveling and an exciting,
mysterious new place. I honestly did not care much for the hero’s love interest
in this book (I liked her much better in the third), but I loved the mystery of
the hidden kingdom the second main POV character stumbles across. I read the third book, and books two and three in this series helped
pull me through to book three in Carr’s Darkwater Saga series. I struggled with its second book, A Shattered Vigil,
because of the darkness, death, and off-screen rape of a secondary character, but I’m glad I continued on with the third book, which was lighter
in tone.
On the other hand,
traveling through a fog for ninety pages with arguing characters, random
attacks, and visions of disturbing drama at home, is not something I remember
with enjoyment from a different series. That, coupled with the very teenage-ish
drama that surfaced, induced me to close the book at its end and not move forward
with series.
5) Shift to political intrigue and quarreling among friends
Is your typical reader likely to purchase a first book in a series because of an interest in political intrigue or quarrels among friends? If not, then take that into consideration before making that the focus of book 2.6) Move at a faster pace at the expense of character interaction
Again, action is good
but relationships trump action. Find a way to combine them. In Avengers: Infinity War, Captain America
and Thor take a breather in the battle to comment on one another’s hair. It’s
not much, but it’s humorous and is a connection between two characters who
haven’t seen one another in a while.
7) Trick the readers, such as by changing the love interest or undoing some victory or expectation set up in the first story
Book 2: The peace is
ruined and the hero must return. That can be okay. What’s not okay, in my
opinion, is having the victory of book 1 be worse than pointless. If the
“victory” actually sets up a much worse ruler and book 2 opens with near total
destruction of a world we loved, readers are going to be sad and feel deceived.
Especially if we aren’t expecting that level of destruction from the story at
all. Watch the story tone.
Also, what’s definitely
not okay is changing the love interest mid-series. Especially if that’s a
strong theme in the book. Romantics don’t like that. We don’t like rooting for
a couple for a book and half only to discover we’ve been duped. Readers don’t
like to be tricked. If we find out the romance we’ve been hoping for for a book
and a half would be incestuous, because, oh yeah, that guy is actually her
brother (good thing they never kissed, right?) and we had no clues to that
effect, readers are going to very, very mad.
Great points! I went to a writer's conference where author David Morrell talked about TV series that spin their wheels. There's only enough material for 4 episodes, but the deal is for eight, so the writers take up time with unnecessary complications.
ReplyDeleteThanks! Yes, that is a problem!
DeleteThese are definitely great points!
ReplyDelete#2 ... yessssssss! Great article! I'm working on book 2 right now, but mine is a prequel, so I'm not doing any of the things I should avoid. haha! However, I also have a book 3 in the works, so I'll def keep these things in mind, as I agree with all of them! Thanks!
ReplyDelete